Increase SQL Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure

In today’s digital landscape, where data reigns supreme, optimizing SQL performance is paramount for businesses aiming to stay competitive. Among the myriad strategies available, improving the execution of stored procedures stands out as a potent method to boost database efficiency and application responsiveness. Let’s delve into actionable tips and techniques to enhance SQL Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure.

How to Increase SQL Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure

Don’t use same parameter name in both stored procedure and executive level


Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure
SQL Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure
Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure
SQL Performance When EXEC the Stored Procedure


  1. Readability: The code becomes less readable because it’s not clear which parameter corresponds to which value.
  2. Maintainability: If you later need to change the order of parameters in the stored procedure, you’d also need to update the calling code to match the new order, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.
  3. Errors: If you accidentally swap the order of the parameters when calling the procedure, it might update the wrong customer with the wrong email address.


  • Improved Readability: The code is easier to understand because it uses meaningful variable names that reflect their purpose.
  • Enhanced Maintainability: If the order of parameters in the stored procedure changes, you don’t need to modify the calling code as long as the parameter names remain distinct.
  • Reduced Errors: The explicit assignment reduces the chance of accidentally passing the wrong values to the procedure.

Don’t use Cursors

Use variable table Instead of temp table

Wherever casting is done on date column as shown below, should be changed

Change From :


Change To :

Where dteEndingDate between  @fromDate +CAST('00:00:00'AS DATETIME)

and @ToDate +CAST('23:59:00'AS DATETIME)

Note: You may remove CAST() in parameter if not required here.

Performance Issues:

  • Multiple Calls: This approach requires several operations: opening/closing the cursor, fetching each record one by one, and potentially multiple update statements.
  • Locking: Cursors can lock rows as they’re processed, impacting other users if the table is heavily accessed.
  • Memory Usage: Cursors can hold all fetched data in memory, impacting performance for large datasets.

Data on the Difference:

There’s no single answer, but benchmarks often show a significant performance difference. Here’s an example:

  • Set-based update: Might take 2 seconds to execute for 10,000 records.
  • Cursor-based update: Could take 10-20 seconds (or more) for the same data due to the reasons mentioned above.

The Takeaway:

  • Set-based operations are generally faster and more efficient for bulk updates in SQL.
  • Cursors might be necessary in specific scenarios (e.g., processing hierarchical data), but they should be used cautiously and after exploring set-based alternatives.

Remember: Always profile your code to identify performance bottlenecks. If a cursor seems necessary, optimize it with techniques like forward-only cursors to minimize overhead.


In conclusion, enhancing the execution of stored procedures is a pivotal step in maximizing SQL performance and ensuring optimal database efficiency. By identifying performance bottlenecks, streamlining query execution, utilizing parameterized queries, and implementing robust error handling, businesses can significantly improve application responsiveness and user satisfaction. Adopting a proactive approach to SQL performance optimization and embracing best practices will empower organizations to stay ahead in today’s competitive digital landscape.